16
Jan
09

Douchebag(s) of the week – Holder and Geithner

Douchebag of the Week!Picking just one Obama nominee for a cabinet post to be Douchebag of the Week proved to be impossible, so we’ve gone with two.  While limiting it to just two wasn’t easy either, giving the award to all of them simply wouldn’t point out the extra douchebag yard these two went in order to win this week.  Our winners are Attorney General Designate Eric Holder and Treasury Secretary Designate (for now) Tim Geithner.

First, let’s deal with Geithner.  The man seeks to be the head of the Treasury Department, which means the IRS would fall under his control.  Turns out he’s not very good at filing his taxes, owing $34,000 more than he has paid for the years 2001 -2003.  It’s being called a “mistake,” and it probably was.  But what does it say about our tax code that the man charged with enforcing the law can’t understand it well enough to follow it accurately?  It would be one thing if he were advocating for flat-tax or something much simpler than we have now by saying, “It’s so screwed up even I can’t follow it!”  But he’s not, he’s the guardian of the status quo, and for that he’s a douchebag.

Seriously, what’s next, the guy who writes the tax laws not following them?  Oops.

Eric Holder is a douchebag not only for his anti-gun stance, but for his anti-free speech stance.  What does that mean?  In his confirmation hearing Holder wasn’t able to give an answer on the question of weather or not he supports the oxymoronically named “Fairness Doctrine,” the regulation that essentially makes unelected FCC bureaucrats program directors of every talk radio station in the country.  Why couldn’t he answer a question that is essentially “do you support free speech?” with a simply yes or no answer?  Because “yes” is popular with the uber-leftists, aka the Democrat base who seek to silence those who dare not kiss the feet of socialism and cherish liberty, but very unpopular with anyone who understands the issue.  It’s dangerous to put someone in that position who refuses to clearly articulate unequivocal support for free speech, and submitting it in writing later only serves to allow nuanced finessing so as to obscure the true meaning.  Dangerous, and douchebaggy.

Congratulations to both of our “winners” this week, you truly have outshined all the other douchebags up for cabinet posts.  But don’t cry for them, they will undoubtedly step up their games in the future and win one of these for themselves.  And we have a feeling this won’t be the last time we hear from you either.  Well done.

Advertisements

1 Response to “Douchebag(s) of the week – Holder and Geithner”


  1. 1 Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
    March 7, 2009 at 10:50 pm

    Speaking of U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder:

    Eric Holder is a racial-minority individual, and in his heart and mind he inevitably does not endorse hate crimes committed by George W. Bush.

    George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).

    George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.

    And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.

    Many people know what Bush did.

    And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.

    Bush was absolute evil.

    Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.

    Bush is a psychological prisoner.

    Bush has a lot to worry about.

    Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.

    In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

    Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
    B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
    Messiah College, Grantham, PA
    Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

    “GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG
    _____________________
    I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


January 2009
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

%d bloggers like this: