Global warming zealots will stop at nothing to impose what their real agenda is, massive taxes and government control over everything in our lives, they know better than we do, after all. But rarely do we get such a clear look at their true motivations like we’re getting today.
An Australian professor wants to tax families that have more than two children $5,000 per child plus an $800 per year carbon tax for each kid because of their “carbon footprint.”
Global warming is not about carbon or temperatures or the debate would be over since temperatures are falling, this is about power and money.
Barry Walters writes:
“Every newborn baby in Australia represents a potent source of greenhouse gas emissions for an average of 80 years, not simply by breathing but by the profligate consumption of resources typical of our society.”
“Far from showering financial booty on new mothers and rewarding greenhouse-unfriendly behaviour, a ‘baby levy’ in the form of a carbon tax should apply, in line with the ‘polluter pays’ principle.”
In other words, the planet would be a good place to live if it weren’t for all these people running around on it.
Meanwhile, no one is calling for eating all the cows to save the planet, just the opposite. If the myth is to be believed, cows produce more greenhouse gases than all other sources combined.
While people like Al Gore are running around saying the debate is over, maybe he should look at his own side first. Until they stop contradicting themselves in an attempt to win power, money and influence, they are not to be taken seriously. Seriously!