Voter fraud loses, Democrats upset: the Supreme Court rules on Indiana case.

It just got a little tougher for liberal activist groups like ACORN to commit voter fraud, and left-wingers aren’t happy about it.  But everyone else should be.

By a vote of 6-3, the Supreme Court upheld an Indiana law that requires voters to produce photo ID, read: prove who they are; when voting.  While liberals complained that this would somehow disenfranchise tens of thousands of voters because some people don’t have identification, the court rightly ruled that since the state offered ID for free to those who couldn’t afford one, that argument was garbage.  Though the most liberal justices, Stephen Breyer, David Souter and Darth Vader Ginsberg still voted against it.

The ACLU is unhappy, which is reason enough to dance.

Shocker! Obama doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

Barack Obama illustrates yet another bit of evidence that Democrats and liberals, in particular himself, have no idea how government really works, and do not understand the world around them.

Karl Rove was kind enough to pick up then pen for the essentially flawed candidate, and give him some campaign advice. Part of the advice is to stop bluffing. Obama went on Meet the Press way back in 2006 and advocated for electronic billing of Medicare and Medicaid.

As Mr. Rove points out in his opinion: “the Bush administration, building on the good work of the Clinton administration, already put in place in 2003 a regulation that requires electronic billing of Medicaid and Medicare. “

Obama was only three years too late in his calling for reform; but like all liberals, “he means well”. What makes this especially scary is that Obama has clearly demonstrated his lack of understanding for these programs and/or their intricacies, yet he advocates for their expansion on a daily basis.

Do you want to pick a president that does not understand how the government functions?

News Flash: John McCain obeys law, New York Times reports, but they miss the real story.

The New York Times, in an attempt to mend fences with the Democratic Party friends over their ridiculous story blaming Hillary Clinton for the negativity and lack of issues in the Democratic primary, has once again taken aim at John McCain and ended up shooting themselves in the foot.

It isn’t a baseless story about an affair that wasn’t, this time it’s about McCain obeying the law about the use of private jets.  The Times reports:

Mr. McCain’s campaign paid a total of $241,149 for the use of that plane from last August through February, records show. That amount is approximately the cost of chartering a similar jet for a month or two, according to industry estimates.

The senator was able to fly so inexpensively because the law specifically exempts aircraft owned by a candidate or his family or by a privately held company they control.

So no law was broken, but it’s worthy of reporting.  No wonder the Times is in the process of going under.

The Times reports that the FEC is missing the number of members to make rule changes:

The Federal Election Commission adopted rules in December to close the loophole – rules that would have required substantial payments by candidates using family-owned planes – but the agency soon lost the requisite number of commissioners needed to complete the rule making.

One thing they fail to mention is that the hold placed on the nomination of the commissioner needed, Hans Von Spakovsky, was blocked in the Senate by Barack Obama.  How do we know this?  We’ve spoken with Mr. Von Spakovsky, who recently withdrew his name from consideration because of the trouble getting confirmed, on the matter.  And who could benefit the most from this?  Barack Obama.  Think about it…